Background
The “mechanical license” allows anyone to make a cover of a copyrighted composition, once the songwriter or composer has himself recorded the song and distributed it. The person making the cover must pay the copyright owner a set fee for each copy of the cover “made and distributed”. Additionally, he must serve the copyright owner with a notice of intent to use the work and provide monthly payments and statements of account.
The mechanical license has been around since the Copyright Act of 1909. However, the provisions contained in Section 115 are rarely used, perhaps because the notice and accounting requirements are cumbersome. Instead, most record labels or artists who want to create covers negotiate a license with the Harry Fox Agency, a collective of composers and publishers. While Section 115 does not prohibit voluntary negotiations between parties, it does act as a ceiling on the rate that can be charged for a license.
By amendment in 1995, Congress extended the mechanical license provisions of Section 115 to digital deliveries of music—referred to as Digital Phonorecord Deliveries or DPDs. This means that whenever a service such as iTunes allows a customer to download a song, the composer of that song must be paid the either the mechanical license or a voluntarily negotiated royalty.
Additional Resources
-
http://www.ascap.com/
ASCAP, at
-
http://www.bmi.com/
BMI, at
-
http://www.sesac.com/index.aspx?flash=1
SESAC, at
-
http://www.hfa.com/
Harry Fox Agency, at
-
http://www.soundexchange.com/
SoundExchange, at
-
http://www.royaltylogic.com/
Royalty Logic, at
-
http://www.riaa.com/
RIAA, at
-
http://www.digmedia.org/
DiMA, at
-
http://www.loc.gov/crb
Copyright Royalty Board, at
-
http://www.savenetradio.org
SaveNetRadio Coalition, at
-
http://www.musicfirstcoalition.org
MusicFirst (an artist organization that supports performance rights for artists from all media including over-the-air radio), at
-
http://www.copyright.gov/docs/regstat031104.html
For an in depth explanation of the mechanical license see Statement of Marybeth Peters, Register of Copyrights to House Subcommittee on March 11, 2004, available at
Recent Blog Posts
- Atlantic Records Reaches Digital/Physical Tipping Point
- Radiohead Reveals In Rainbows Sales Data
- THIS MONDAY: Copyright Tutorial for Musicians in Rochester, NY
- Reflections on the 10th Anniversary of the Sonny Bono Act
- Music Label Shut Down for [not] Infringing Itself
- Looking Back at Five Years of RIAA Litigation
- Of Dancing Babies and Overzealous Takedowns: When “fair use is hard!” doesn’t cut it
- Is Home Taping Killing Music or is the Music Industry Killing Home Taping?
- New York State Court Holds That Fair Use Applies to Sound Recordings
- Cablevision remote DVR case sets the standard: Copyright Office should follow suit
